0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Overpass
60%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
50%
Vertigo
35%
Mirage
17%
Ancient
15%
Anubis
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Overpass
40%
5
3
Inferno
50%
10
0
Nuke
50%
8
2
Vertigo
60%
5
1
Mirage
67%
12
0
Ancient
60%
10
0
Anubis
0%
0
4
Dernières 5 cartes
Overpass
100%
1
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Vertigo
25%
4
0
Mirage
50%
6
0
Ancient
75%
4
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Derniers résultats
Matchs précédents
- gpggg
- pggpg
Informations
Match analysis of AJF vs Sharks Youngsters by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AJF and Sharks Youngsters, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Vertigo, and victory was secured by AJF. The MVP of this match was urban0.
AJF analytics
The team AJF secured 35 out of 65 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Vertigo. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AJF were urban0 contributed 55 kills and max contributed 47 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24069 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AJF held their ground firmly, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sharks Youngsters analytics
The team Sharks Youngsters managed to secure 30 out of 65 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sharks Youngsters were pepe contributed 51 kills and ksloks contributed 48 kills. 23927 of total damage by Sharks Youngsters could not prevent AJF from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sharks Youngsters struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires