0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Ancient (M2)
Records Ancient
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:31s01:30s
Éliminations avec AWP en moyenne par carte
226.5798
Dégâts avec AWP en moyenne (par tour)
63.521.6
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
14.64.6
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.83.4
Dégâts (total/round)
40873
Score du joueur (round)
37431012
Tirs (total/round)
16616
Tirs (total/round)
8916
Tirs (total/round)
8416
Informations
Map Analysis of AGO vs ALTERNATE aTTaX by the Bo3.gg Team
AGO on Ancient Analysis
AGO demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 15 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for AGO on Ancient were jedqr, who contributed 26 kills, and snatchie, who added 28 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 11352 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ALTERNATE aTTaX on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for ALTERNATE aTTaX, as they managed to secure 13 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX on Ancient included PerX, who contributed 26 kills, and PANIX, who added 25 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11260 total damage, ALTERNATE aTTaX couldn't prevent AGO from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, ALTERNATE aTTaX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires