0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:28s01:24s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:23s01:24s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:27s01:24s
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8168
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
5428
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1914.3232
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
8.82
Dégâts avec Tec-9 en moyenne (par tour)
113.6
Victoires éco contre achat complet
1
Score du joueur (round)
39741010
Informations
Match analysis of 500 Rush vs Insomnia by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 500 Rush and Insomnia, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by Insomnia. The MVP of this match was KukuBambo.
Insomnia analytics
The team Insomnia secured 36 out of 62 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Mirage. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Insomnia were KukuBambo contributed 51 kills and ANeraX contributed 45 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22590 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Insomnia held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
500 Rush analytics
The team 500 Rush managed to secure 26 out of 62 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for 500 Rush were aimy contributed 43 kills and next1me contributed 37 kills. 22339 of total damage by 500 Rush could not prevent Insomnia from securing the victory
On the defensive side, 500 Rush struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires