0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:33s01:23s
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1714.2369
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
18.23.4
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
94.306
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
51.916.3
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
61.425.2
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
12.44.2
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
21.3022
Dégâts avec Tec-9 en moyenne (par tour)
10.83.7
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Informations
Map Analysis of 500 vs Partizan by the Bo3.gg Team
500 on Inferno Analysis
500 demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for 500 on Inferno were Rainwaker, who contributed 18 kills, and SPELLAN, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7071 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, 500 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Partizan on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Partizan, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Partizan on Inferno included Kind0, who contributed 13 kills, and VLDN, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5430 total damage, Partizan couldn't prevent 500 from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Partizan struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires