0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M1)
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Mirage
67%
Dust II
57%
Inferno
37%
Overpass
18%
Ancient
6%
Nuke
B
3%
Vertigo
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
100%
1
2
Dust II
100%
3
3
Inferno
75%
8
0
Overpass
71%
7
0
Ancient
50%
2
5
Nuke
50%
4
4
Vertigo
0%
0
8
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
33%
12
10
Dust II
43%
14
2
Inferno
38%
29
1
Overpass
53%
17
1
Ancient
44%
25
2
Nuke
53%
15
4
Vertigo
0%
0
16
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- gpggg
- ppgpp
Informations
Map Analysis of 500 vs Beyond Possible by the Bo3.gg Team
Beyond Possible on Inferno Analysis
Beyond Possible demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 27 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Beyond Possible on Inferno were SPELLAN, who contributed 24 kills, and viltrex, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10746 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Beyond Possible held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
500 on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for 500, as they managed to secure 0 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for 500 on Inferno included SHiPZ, who contributed 22 kills, and P4TriCK, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9064 total damage, 500 couldn't prevent Beyond Possible from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, 500 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires