0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8171
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
31.6074
Round rapide (sec)
00:21s01:55s
Score du joueur (round)
35051011
Score du joueur (round)
36341011
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Ancient
58%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
25%
Vertigo
22%
Mirage
15%
Anubis
10%
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
42%
12
0
Inferno
50%
4
4
Nuke
0%
1
16
Vertigo
60%
5
5
Mirage
40%
5
1
Anubis
63%
8
1
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
100%
1
7
Inferno
0%
0
9
Nuke
25%
4
4
Vertigo
38%
13
0
Mirage
25%
4
1
Anubis
53%
19
0
Informations
Match analysis of 1WIN vs V1dar by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 1WIN and V1dar, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by 1WIN. The MVP of this match was latt1kk.
1WIN analytics
The team 1WIN secured 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 1WIN were latt1kk contributed 20 kills and neaLaN contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7836 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 1WIN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
V1dar analytics
The team V1dar managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for V1dar were 4X1s contributed 16 kills and Alv contributed 11 kills. 5754 of total damage by V1dar could not prevent 1WIN from securing the victory
On the defensive side, V1dar struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires