0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Ancient (M1)
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Ancient
61%
Inferno
59%
Mirage
58%
Vertigo
50%
Dust II
f
45%
Overpass
41%
Nuke
f
17%
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
61%
33
7
Inferno
59%
32
15
Mirage
58%
26
24
Vertigo
50%
8
43
Dust II
55%
11
31
Overpass
41%
32
2
Nuke
33%
12
34
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
0%
1
1
Inferno
0%
0
2
Mirage
0%
1
1
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Dust II
100%
2
0
Overpass
0%
2
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ggggp
- pp
Informations
Map Analysis of PROSPECTS vs flowstate by the Bo3.gg Team
PROSPECTS on Ancient Analysis
PROSPECTS demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 0 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for PROSPECTS on Ancient were hype, who contributed 26 kills, and FRANSSON, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 11856 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, PROSPECTS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
flowstate on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for flowstate, as they managed to secure 30 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for flowstate on Ancient included 1ll-, who contributed 28 kills, and Bels, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8701 total damage, flowstate couldn't prevent PROSPECTS from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, flowstate struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires