MIBR Anzeigetafel

+/-

KARTEN ACS

Raze

30

29

6

+1

167

4:5

5

0

Lotus156

241

-6%

OmenBrimstone

25

34

16

-9

121

3:4

7

0

Lotus225

194

-9%

BreachSkye

21

28

8

-7

111

2:4

6

1

Lotus214

161

-9%

Deadlock

17

33

8

-16

100

1:8

4

0

Lotus94

140

-29%

KilljoyCypher

17

30

3

-13

79

1:7

5

0

Lotus56

120

-33%

Gesamt

110

154

41

-44

578

11:28

27

1

Lotus149

171

-17%

100 Thieves Anzeigetafel

+/-

KARTEN ACS

NeonRaze

41

24

11

+17

187

14:4

12

1

Lotus368

298

+33%

CloveBrimstone

38

22

9

+16

193

6:2

11

0

Lotus263

277

+21%

Fade

30

19

14

+11

132

3:0

6

1

Lotus188

195

+17%

BreachGekko

24

20

18

+4

101

0:2

4

0

Lotus145

160

+5%

OmenViper

21

25

13

-4

100

5:3

6

1

Lotus157

159

-17%

Gesamt

154

110

65

+44

713

28:11

39

3

Lotus224

218

+12%

Clash.gg 3 cases
Aufstellungen
Aufstellung
Aufstellung
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Die Teams haben sich in den letzten 6 Monaten nicht getroffen
Vergangene Spiele
Teams Vorteil

Karten

ACS

171

218

Lotus75

Runden

13

26

Lotus9

Tötungen

110

154

Lotus30

Schaden

22.54K

27.79K

Lotus3417

Ökonomie

648.65K

743.45K

Lotus62100

Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs 100 Thieves by the Bo3.gg Team

In the Valorant match between MIBR and 100 Thieves, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Lotus, Bind, and victory was secured by 100 Thieves. The MVP of this match was Asuna.


100 Thieves analytics

The team 100 Thieves secured 26 out of 39 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Lotus, Bind. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.


The standout players for 100 Thieves were Asuna contributed 41 kills and Cryo contributed 38 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 27791 overall damage.


On the defensive side, 100 Thieves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


MIBR analytics

The team MIBR managed to secure 13 out of 39 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for MIBR were aspas contributed 30 kills and xenom contributed 25 kills. 22538 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent 100 Thieves from securing the victory


On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum