Case Esports Anzeigetafel

+/-

KARTEN ACS

Derzeit liegen keine Daten vor
KPI Gaming Anzeigetafel

+/-

KARTEN ACS

Derzeit liegen keine Daten vor
Clash.gg 3 cases
Aufstellungen
Aufstellung
  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

Derzeit gibt es keine Teamaufstellung
Aufstellung
  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

  • Starter

Derzeit gibt es keine Teamaufstellung
Letzte Ergebnisse
Vergangene Spiele
Teams Vorteil

Derzeit sind keine Spieldaten vorhanden
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate

Bind

100%

Haven

75%

Pearl

57%

Ascent

50%

Fracture

33%

Split

0%

Breeze

0%

Icebox

0%

Letzte 5 Karten

Bind

0%

0

Haven

75%

4

w
w
w
l

Pearl

0%

2

l
l

Ascent

100%

4

w
w
w

Fracture

33%

3

l
l
w

Split

0%

0

Breeze

0%

0

Icebox

100%

5

w
w
w
w
w

Letzte 5 Karten

Bind

100%

1

w

Haven

0%

0

Pearl

57%

7

w
w
l
l
l

Ascent

50%

6

w
w
l
l
w

Fracture

0%

0

Split

0%

1

l

Breeze

0%

1

l

Icebox

100%

2

w
w
Info
Match analysis of Case Esports vs KPI Gaming by the Bo3.gg Team

In the Valorant match between Case Esports and KPI Gaming, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ascent, and victory was secured by Case Esports. The MVP of this match was .


Case Esports analytics

The team Case Esports secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ascent. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.


The standout players for Case Esports were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.


On the defensive side, Case Esports held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


KPI Gaming analytics

The team KPI Gaming managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for KPI Gaming were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by KPI Gaming could not prevent Case Esports from securing the victory


On the defensive side, KPI Gaming struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Kommentare
Nach Datum