0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:22s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:22s
HE damage (avg/round)
12.43.4
Galil kills on a map
31.8164
M4A1 kills on a map
84.2536
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
52.916.3
AK47 damage (avg/round)
58.225.2
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.14.2
M4A1 kills on a map
84.2536
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
53.616.3







Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
58%
Inferno
31%
Train
30%
Anubis
13%
Dust II
11%
Mirage
7%
Ancient
5%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
36
Inferno
56%
16
11
Train
50%
8
3
Anubis
46%
24
7
Dust II
67%
24
7
Mirage
41%
27
10
Ancient
53%
30
5
Last 5 maps
Nuke
58%
12
10
Inferno
25%
12
17
Train
80%
5
10
Anubis
33%
6
26
Dust II
56%
16
3
Mirage
48%
25
7
Ancient
58%
36
0
Info
Match analysis of Nemiga vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Nemiga and BIG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Dust II, Inferno, and victory was secured by Nemiga. The MVP of this match was zweih.
Nemiga analytics
The team Nemiga secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Nemiga were zweih contributed 39 kills and Xant3r contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15951 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Nemiga held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BIG analytics
The team BIG managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BIG were JDC contributed 30 kills and tabseN contributed 26 kills. 14668 of total damage by BIG could not prevent Nemiga from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments