0 Commentaires
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Train
100%
Anubis
67%
Ancient
63%
Dust II
56%
Inferno
50%
Mirage
5%
Nuke
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Train
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Mirage
50%
2
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Train
100%
1
2
Anubis
67%
15
1
Ancient
63%
8
0
Dust II
56%
9
1
Inferno
50%
4
3
Mirage
45%
11
1
Nuke
0%
0
8
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- gpggp
- pgpgp
Informations
Map Analysis of Supernova Comets vs MCS by the Bo3.gg Team
on Dust II Analysis
demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for on Dust II were , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Supernova Comets on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Supernova Comets, as they managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Supernova Comets on Dust II included , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, Supernova Comets couldn't prevent from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Supernova Comets struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires